Tags: William Gilpin Three Essays On The PicturesqueSolving Math Problems With StepsHow To Solve Interest Rate ProblemsFamily Roots EssayPopular Culture Essay QuestionsHow To Write An A EssayBlink 182 Essay
For a piquant illustration of the difference that political engineering can make, consider the case of Bernie Sanders—former Socialist mayor of Burlington, current Independent senator from Vermont, possible candidate from the left in the next presidential race. After one of the planes caught fire last summer on a runway in Florida, Sanders told a reporter that the program had been “incredibly wasteful.” Yet Sanders, with the rest of Vermont’s mainly left-leaning political establishment, has fought hard to get an F-35 unit assigned to the Vermont Air National Guard in Burlington, and to dissuade neighborhood groups there who think the planes will be too noisy and dangerous.“For better or worse, [the F-35] is the plane of record right now,” Sanders told a local reporter after the runway fire last year, “and it is not gonna be discarded. didn’t consider it even when fighting Chinese troops during the Korean War.) By the time the plane’s full costs and capabilities become apparent, Chuck Spinney wrote last summer, the airplane, “like the F-35 today, will be unstoppable.” That is because even now its supporters are building the plane’s “social safety net by spreading the subcontracts around the country, or perhaps like the F-35, around the world.”Politicians say that national security is their first and most sacred duty, but they do not act as if this is so.
In other countries, the F-35 can be cast as another annoying American intrusion.
Here, it is protected by supplier contracts that have been spread as broadly as possible.“Political engineering,” a term popularized by a young Pentagon analyst named Chuck Spinney in the 1970s, is pork-barrel politics on the grandest scale.
In their 2012 debates, Mitt Romney criticized Barack Obama for supporting “green energy” projects, including Solyndra.
Neither man mentioned the F-35, and I am still looking for evidence that President Obama has talked about it in any of his speeches.
Cost overruns sound bad if someone else is getting the extra money.
They can be good if they are creating business for your company or jobs in your congressional district.The public attitude evident in the airport was reflected by the public’s representatives in Washington.That same afternoon, September 17, the House of Representatives voted after brief debate to authorize arms and supplies for rebel forces in Syria, in hopes that more of them would fight against the Islamic State, or than for it.while President Obama was fending off complaints that he should have done more, done less, or done something different about the overlapping crises in Iraq and Syria, he traveled to Central Command headquarters, at Mac Dill Air Force Base in Florida. The part of the speech intended to get coverage was Obama’s rationale for reengaging the United States in Iraq, more than a decade after it first invaded and following the long and painful effort to extricate itself.There he addressed some of the men and women who would implement whatever the U. This was big enough news that many cable channels covered the speech live.That’s the reality.” It’s going to be somewhere, so why not here? The next big project the Air Force is considering is the Long Range Strike Bomber, a successor to the B-1 and B-2 whose specifications include an ability to do bombing runs deep into China. The most recent defense budget passed the House Armed Services Committee by a vote of 61 to zero, with similarly one-sided debate before the vote.This is the same House of Representatives that cannot pass a long-term Highway Trust Fund bill that both parties support.As soon as that was over, they went back to their smartphones and their laptops and their Cinnabons as the president droned on. He noted that they were often the face of American influence in the world, being dispatched to Liberia in 2014 to cope with the then-dawning Ebola epidemic as they had been sent to Indonesia 10 years earlier to rescue victims of the catastrophic tsunami there.Usually I would have stopped watching too, since so many aspects of public figures’ appearances before the troops have become so formulaic and routine. Obama gave his still-not-quite-natural-sounding callouts to the different military services represented in the crowd. He said that the “9/11 generation of heroes” represented the very best in its country, and that its members constituted a military that was not only superior to all current adversaries but no less than “the finest fighting force in the history of the world.”If any of my fellow travelers at O’Hare were still listening to the speech, none of them showed any reaction to it. This has become the way we assume the American military will be discussed by politicians and in the press: Overblown, limitless praise, absent the caveats or public skepticism we would apply to other American institutions, especially ones that run on taxpayer money. Then everyone except the few people in uniform getting on with their workaday concerns.I watched it on an overhead TV while I sat waiting for a flight at Chicago’s O’Hare airport.When Obama got to the section of his speech announcing whether he planned to commit U. troops in Iraq (at the time, he didn’t), I noticed that many people in the terminal shifted their attention briefly to the TV. ” in the official White House transcript.) He told members of the military that the nation was grateful for their nonstop deployments and for the unique losses and burdens placed on them through the past dozen years of open-ended war.