Tags: Trademark Law EssayEssays On Bullying In CanadaWill Write Your ThesisWhat To Say In An EssayTopics For Nursing Research ProposalsUniversity Of Maryland Essay Prompts 2014
Ultimately, what you’re doing is making a recommendation to the editor, who may or may not have the expertise required to evaluate the work being done.
Reviews require considerable attention and reflection, and editors and authors require substance and specifics.
Dashing off a short paragraph that simply says the paper is inadequate and should not be published is unhelpful and far from good enough.
However, with very few opportunities for formal training in reviewing manuscripts, many are left to figure it out for themselves, and can end up feeling lost and intimidated.
This post will guide you through the main points of writing a good peer review.
How To Write Highlights for an Academic or Scientific Paper Although some academic and scientific journals have a long tradition of requesting summaries of key findings from the authors of articles accepted for publication, highlights are, for the most part,...
The Dos and Don’ts of How To Reply to Peer Review Comments When that journal editor you have been waiting to hear from finally writes to say that the research paper you submitted cannot be published in its present form...
• Most peer reviews are blind, which is to say that the author will not know the identity of the reviewer, but even if this policy is not in place, avoid personal remarks and personal details in your review report.
• Suggestions for improvements should certainly be offered, but within reason.
It is unethical to use your position as a reviewer in order to force authors to cite your publications. As a scientific reviewer you will read many papers that approach and discuss issues in ways that you might not, and even papers that come to conclusions that contradict your own research and writing.
The question is whether the research is valid and the paper makes an impact, not whether you like that impact or not.