There is no reason, without more evidence, to assume the water caused the person to be sick.Genetic Fallacy: This conclusion is based on an argument that the origins of a person, idea, institute, or theory determine its character, nature, or worth.Example: In this example, the two choices are presented as the only options, yet the author ignores a range of choices in between such as developing cleaner technology, car-sharing systems for necessities and emergencies, or better community planning to discourage daily driving.
There is no reason, without more evidence, to assume the water caused the person to be sick.Tags: Dissertation Report On MarketingExpository Essay Student ModelHip Hop Research PaperPro And Cons Of HomeworkCommonapp Essay PromptsProcess Of Writing An Argumentative EssayMy Assignment
Getting on the bandwagon is one such instance of an ad populum appeal.Example: In this example, the author switches the discussion away from the safety of the food and talks instead about an economic issue, the livelihood of those catching fish.While one issue may effect the other it does not mean we should ignore possible safety issues because of possible economic consequences to a few individuals.Example: In this example, the author equates being a "true American," a concept that people want to be associated with, particularly in a time of war, with allowing people to buy any vehicle they want even though there is no inherent connection between the two.Red Herring: This is a diversionary tactic that avoids the key issues, often by avoiding opposing arguments rather than addressing them.Example: In this example the author is equating the character of a car with the character of the people who built the car. Begging the Claim: The conclusion that the writer should prove is validated within the claim.Example: Arguing that coal pollutes the earth and thus should be banned would be logical.Example: In this example, the author doesn't even name particular strategies Green Peace has suggested, much less evaluate those strategies on their merits.Instead, the author attacks the characters of the individuals in the group.Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.