Despite, or perhaps because of, these flaws and the discomfort they inspire, we should accompany Row through this important inquiry.was done in two batches, suggesting that Jonson was still at work revising this play when the folio printing began, though some revision could have taken place earlier.Tags: Research Paper On International Accounting StandardsFlannery O'Connor ThesisOxbridge Essays GuardianZara Fast Fashion Case Study SolutionBusiness Plan Operations PlanStep By Step Directions For Writing A Research PaperJim Smiley And His Jumping Frog EssayPet Writing Paper
Literary white flight — into imagined worlds from which black people and the urgent questions their presence begs have been absented — is no less a matter of power.
Row demonstrates this through astute close readings in which he analyzes postwar fiction with a loving sternness that avoids didacticism even as he pingpongs among cultural artifacts, decoding everything from Don De Lillo’s “Underworld” to emo music.
In “Eating the Blame,” an essay that posits Sedgwick’s notion of “reparative writing” as an alternative to a facile liberalism, he announces that he will donate his book advance to a Native-owned art collective in South Dakota.
It’s a strange gesture: The essay purports to be about aesthetics and racial justice in , only to mutate into a meditation on charity.
In any case, it seems beside the point to uphold writers of color who do this work, as they have since the nation’s founding, when Row’s chief concern is that white writers should develop their own means for thinking critically about race.
It doesn’t help that the book includes some fumbling gestures.It’s a project that owes a debt to Toni Morrison’s 1992 book “Playing in the Dark.” Morrison wrote of an “Africanist” presence in American literature that amounted to no authentic black presence at all, only static figures representing “notions of excessive, limitless love, anarchy or routine dread.” Row extends that analysis by turning his attention to the giants of postwar American literature, in whose work new forms of marginalization take root.In wrestling with such fiction’s relationship to race, his collection draws its title and central concept from a distinctly 20th-century phenomenon: the exodus of white Americans from inner cities as the federal government experimented with integration policies and social unrest overtook communities across the nation.In the title essay, he considers the setting of nearly all Anne Tyler’s work: Baltimore, particularly the neighborhood of Roland Park.Tyler is a writer “rooted in a place that is so comfortable, unthreatening and familiar that it becomes almost featureless, a state of psychic stability that needs no explicit expression.” So, too, Roland Park is a site of timeless normalcy, a place where the white world “will never be significantly altered.”Yet this normalcy depends on the general absence of black people.“My parents made sure I knew never to go up there, not for any reason.”The effect of literary white flight is to regulate the American imagination and reproduce racialized power.Flight allows whiteness to function as if it were universal, a stand-in for “human,” rather than a particular racial category that relies on blackness for its expression.In his 2014 essay “The Case for Reparations,” Ta-Nehisi Coates argued that white flight was a socially engineered conspiracy, an attempt to maintain white political and economic domination at a moment when black activism and federal intervention threatened to erode both.For Row, there’s an analogue in contemporary fiction: white authors fleeing the problem of race.We elected an African-American president.”Mc Connell’s remarks bear the rhetorical hallmarks of white America’s stunted engagement with race: the attempt to isolate anti-blackness to the institution of chattel slavery; the gesture toward self-exoneration through a rejection of personal culpability for slavery; and, most important, an insistence that discrete acts of atonement nullify the need for conversation about race.In his new essay collection, “White Flights: Race, Fiction, and the American Imagination,” the novelist Jess Row trains his attention on moments like Mc Connell’s news conference, when American discourse on race addresses anti-blackness by not addressing it at all — or, at least, not in a serious way, one that would threaten white people’s place atop the nation’s racial hierarchy.