Educators go through a rigorous application process, and every answer they submit is reviewed by our in-house editorial team. In an individualistic society such as ours, the needs and wants of an individual take precedence over the needs of the group.
Positives to individualism include the freedom for a person to choose his or her own destiny.
So, does being, or trying to be, in a collective group worth losing happiness over? Doesn’t sound too positive or happy when referred to as a mob, does it?
When people are in a group, they sometimes stop thinking and just go with the wishes of their peers. If being in a group doesn’t lead to any of those things, then the group itself has already taken control.
The other side of the coin is that being human is not anything significant as an individual and that any kind of development is dependent upon nationalism.
But, does being in a collective group actually hurt more than being an individual?From early on, this has been valued in American life, at least for white males.For example, in his essay "Self-Reliance," Emerson admonished young men to follow the stirrings... In an individualistic society such as ours, the needs and wants of an individual take precedence over the needs of the group.The urge to fit in is an unneeded duty that society requires to make everyone accepted because they then feel “normal.” Simplified, when people want to fit in, feel accepted, and conform, problems show up.Emerson was a transcendentalist, but he emerged from a Protestant Christianity that valued the primacy of the individual conscience, as well as the individual's personal relationship with God.Puritans and Quakers came to this continent seeking religious freedom—in fact, their religions were lumped in England under the label of "Nonconformism," and they were known as "Dissenters." So from our earliest beginnings, individualism informed the American consciousness, though, ironically, this was also severely limited in some places, such as the Massachusetts Bay Colony, with strict guidelines about how to live one's external life.We continue to struggle to mediate between meeting the basic needs of all people while, at the same time, rewarding individuals for their efforts and achievements.Therefore, while the role of individualism in our society is twofold, both allowing for freedom of conscience and encouraging the highest possible creativity and achievement, it is also tempered by a strong current of social justice.When someone is unwilling to think for themselves, and accept the wishes of the people around them, it looks and smells a lot like a collective. So, stressing over becoming one with society is hurtful.