A random example is this abstract on the effect of coffee consumption on Acute Coronary Syndrome.
A random example is this abstract on the effect of coffee consumption on Acute Coronary Syndrome.Tags: Thesis Statement On Evil3 Page Persuasive EssayExample Of A Literature Review EssayEssential Components Of A Business PlanEasy Evaluation Essay TopicsQuestions To Think About When Writing An EssayBuying Term PapersNora Helmer Essay
Tables, Figures, Appendix The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page.
When asking the experimenter if they should stop, they were instructed to continue.
Of the 40 participants in the study, 26 delivered the maximum shocks.
Current theories focus on personal characteristics to explain wrong-doing and how someone can intentionally harm others.
Abstract In A Research Paper Example
In a survey, professionals such as doctors, psychologist and laymen predicted that a small proportion of a population (1-3%) would harm others if ordered to do so.Page 1: Title, Author, Work/School Page 2: Abstract: A short summary of the article. References Through the text there are references, sources of knowledge, which you've used.Page 3-: Introduction Current theories about the topic. Citing those will give you more credibility because good research is thought to be based on other knowledge and empirical (observed) evidence.The experiment will test whether a person can keep administering painful electric shocks to another person just because they are ordered to do so.The expectation is that very few will keep giving shocks, and that most participants will disobey the order. They were recruited by advertisement in a newspaper and were paid .50.Most theories suggest that only very disturbed people are capable of administering pain to an ordinary citizen if they are ordered to do so.Our experiment tested people's obedience to authority.In the recent war trial with Adolph Eichmann, he claims to only have been “following orders". Can people harm others because they are merely obeying orders?Can people be ordered to act against their moral convictions?The study shows that people are able to harm others intentionally if ordered to do so.It provides evidence that this dynamic is far more important than previously believed, and that personal ethics are less predictive of such behavior. Discussion and Conclusion What are our thought about the results compared to other relevant theories.